Last week I shared the pitch for my Digital Artifact, where I breakdown my intent and personal media niche for the semester. You can read the post here, but as a quick overview I plan to conduct research into the media niche of music – specifically around the pop punk, emo metal genres – by observing the communities and personas built around them online. Last week, it was not only me but my peers who shared these types of blog posts and I have had the privilege to engage and peer review some.
“The process provides a reviewer with the opportunity to reflect on someone else’s work and to provide thoughtful comment using his/her own knowledge and expertise of the subject.” Peer reviewing is an important aspect in not only gaining insight into your own abilities but it allows the chance to be interactive and supportive to others. I think this is a great aspect of the community we have. I believe that I was able to convey my feedback and critique well by engaging my personal understandings with each pitch and providing ideas the authors might not have thought of. It is important to me to not just focus on anything negative, and to be helpful in furthering each project as well as highlighting a job well done.
Hannah’s Digital Artifact pitch goes into extreme depth about the ethnographic research about their chosen niche around the alarming forefronts of climate change. It is very well researched and clearly written which enables a multitude of audiences and understanding. Their post was detailed, structured and very professional when discussing this topic, as well as being incredibly informative. Because of this, when reviewing their post I included a secondary source – Bushfires in Australia: a serious health emergency under climate change – which explores their niche in relation to Australia specifically and could be useful in furthering their research and provides a geographical example of this crisis.
Hannah’s pitch was analytical and professional presenting, which is something I myself have taken away from this experience as something I need to improve. Their work was defined and developed to the point it felt personal and not a “University task” which I believe is something I can work on and develop in the future.
Lisa’s pitch was lovely and really taps into the whole concept of persona in relation to our lectures and class work. This, I believe, was expressed very much through her words as well as her audio visual elemented. It is clear to me that they have a tight understanding of who they present themself as in relation to Youtube, as well as their own media consumption. They were able to analyse the analytical concepts presented with clearity. Their pitch was broad and open, as one’s persona might be, and I provide a source in relation to mentioned ideas – cooking and healthy food – to perhaps aid in narrowing down some future points for their project.
Lisa’s work allowed me to see areas of persona, which is a very large aspect of my own Digital Artifact, that I myself am lacking in showcasing through my blog posts. For example, Lisa dives deep into the analytics of persona where I have just briefly touched on it to further my points not educate and engage. I believe this is something I can take away from by reviewing their pitch, along with making better and larger connections to frameworks and lectures as a whole.
Vincenzo does a great job at utilising both audio visual elements and blog post as a cohesive piece to be understood together, rather than simply having a blog post with a side of more information in a Youtube video. They are very interested in their chosen niche on a deep personal level that they have a personal connection. I think providing us with this information is great because it explores the relation between niche topic and creator – I would take the word or perspective from someone with pre-existing knowledge and persona before someone who is just touching the surface of a new niche. That being said, there was little explanation on why this is an interest, or why the photography element corresponds and going from that I provided a source which I hope aids in capturing how to express this in future.
Vincenzo’s Digital Artifact as mentioned before does this fantastic job at making both types of format cohesive, and I will be the first one to admit that this is something I struggle with in presenting. Engaging with their work has enabled me to witness examples and ideas on video creation which I can transcribe into my own work in the future. Their pitch was very helpful in this for me, and I appreciate the opportunity to review their work.
I think in the future I can improve the feedback I give by going further into the sources and even by providing more than one to enhance the take away for my peers. Overall though, I believe that by conducting peer reviews has not only given me insight into others but has allowed for me to grow in my own work and understanding. I will be taking everything I have learnt here and the critics given to me to grow with my DA.